by Sarah-Eve Farquhar (2005)
The Government is keen to help more mothers into paid work but will it be children who pay the greatest price because of problems with the policy focus?
Although expressing different views on the purpose of childcare or early childhood education, Prime Minister Helen Clark and Education Minister Trevor Mallard seem to agree that little children can do just as well, if not better, outside of the family.
To appeal to the business community concerned about labour supply, Clark has floated the idea of possible State paid dawn-to-dusk care for school-aged children. She also said that to get more childcare for under-fives available more quickly the government is looking at how to increase the number of women who will care for other people’s children in their own homes.
Mallard has promoted centre-based early childhood education as a public good. Omitting unwelcome evidence of risks to children and costs to society further down the track of producing a latch-key generation, he argues the need for ever more early childhood education to improve children’s outcomes.
The funding that goes into the early childhood sector, into childcare subsidies, and into the administration of the sector has grown phenomenally in the past few years. Low income families can access a Childcare Subsidy for nine hours a week, regardless of their need for childcare support. Many more families are entitled to receive a Childcare Subsidy for up to 50 hours a week if they are in work or can claim special circumstances.
From 2007, all parents of 3 to 5 year-olds, whether in work or not, are promised access to no-cost childcare of 20 hours a week in community-owned centres staffed by teachers. The government is planning to do more to expand the provision and reduce the cost of early childhood education.
The Government should be prepared to face two problems. The first is how people who choose not to have children and how parents who do not want to use the government’s choice of quality childcare services will react to paying more for the choices of other people.
The second problem is that it is not simply the cost or a lack of affordable childcare that limits parents’ participation in paid work. Participation is affected by a number of factors, such as the number of children and spread in ages, children’s needs, parents’ values and goals for their children, travel distances, and support with household work and meeting children’s needs.
The Government seems unlikely to take a long-term view of addressing the interrelated issues of birth rate, promoting parenting and creating true choices for parents.
Given where all the policy papers and work is focused, it would be a wise government that gave time for public discussion and debate on the purpose of early childhood education, where and with whom young children do best and in what circumstances.
To keep reading and view the full article login with your member's username and password
Here’s how our membership plans work:
- Individual Membership plans can view both Individual member-only articles and our library of Research Journals (but not the ECE Service management article area). In addition, individual members can discuss and ask questions of fellow members any time through the online childcare and early childhood education practice, policy, and research discussion forum.
- Early Childhood Service plans can view ALL member articles: Individual, Research Journals and Early Childhood Service articles. Also on this membership plan members can access the online discussion forum for individual members AND the online ECE service management / business forum.
- Research Journal subscription plans can view our library of Research Journals and related research articles only
Should you not hold a current membership – you are welcome to apply now.