By Sarah Alexander
There has been substantial study of the quality of early years education yet only recently have researchers started to ask questions and take approaches that have some relevance and meaning for practice in early childhood programmes.
This paper reviews the ways in which research has shaped our perception of quality in early childhood education and associated limitations. The dominant approach to quality is then explained and some additional comparatively new approaches are identified.
At present there is confusion as to what “quality” means due to the emergence of the stakeholder approach in the early 1990s and a more recent postmodernist interpretation (Dahlberg, Moss & Pence, 1999). To overcome this, and to increase specificity and relevance, it is suggested that we should look to the different dimensions of the word “quality” instead of regarding quality as a global, one-word-fits-all construct.
There are (at least) three different, distinct dimensions of quality in the early childhood field, namely: “standards”, “organisational culture/excellence”, and “client benefits”.
This paper includes a useful diagram showing different paths that quality promotion and assurance can take - and the consequences of this.
To read and print a copy of this paper click on the file name below:
Login with your member's username and password to keep reading
Here’s how our membership plans work
- Individual Membership plans can view both Individual member-only articles and our library of Research Journals.
- Early Childhood Service plans can view ALL member articles: Individual, Research Journals and Early Childhood Service articles - along with support and a range of other benefits as outlined on the Join Us page
- Research Journal subscription plans can view our library of Research Journals and the articles in all past and current jounral issues.
Should you not hold a current membership – you are welcome to apply now.