by Marilyn Fleer (University of Canberra) and Anne Kennedy (Monash University)
Published in the NZRECE Journal, Vol. 3, 2000, pp. 13 - 30.
Government involvement in quality assurance is becoming the trend in many countries, including New Zealand. What values underpin the systems that evolve in each country, and who has given legitimacy to them? In the context of the prevailing ideology of early childhood, this paper unpacks quality assurance in Australia and comments on the assumptions, taken for granted premises and values which are implicit within such a process, with a view to providing valuable lessons for others who are considering going down this path.
There is a predominance of terms such as quality measures, excellence, best practice and benchmarking in the education and care community within English speaking countries. A rationalist discourse has not just stimulated measurement activity, it has also led to calls for accountability. Early childhood education has not escaped these changes (Farquhar, 1999a, b). As such, it is important to unpack not just the accountability processes, but the values underpinning them.
What do we mean by quality assurance? Whose quality are we talking about? In the process of developing quality assurance guidelines and processes, we have distanced ourselves from these issues and as such, we have come to believe
…facts can be split from values, we hope to treat definitions and choices as technical issues and leave them to expert technicians,
without the need to question how and why they are arrived at. The ‘discourse of quality’ offers us confidence and reassurance
by holding out the prospect that a certain score or just the very use of the word quality means that something is to be trusted, that it really is good (Dahlberg, Moss & Pence, 1999, p. 92).
In the process of developing quality assurance programmes such as the Australian Quality Improvement and Accreditation System (QIAS), not only have we distanced ourselves from the values that underpin the guidelines that become sanctioned, we also view these guidelines as universally relevant.
Read the full article by clicking on the link below.
To keep reading and view the full article login with your member's username and password
Here’s how our membership plans work:
- Individual Membership plans can view both Individual member-only articles and our library of Research Journals (but not the ECE Service management article area). In addition, individual members can discuss and ask questions of fellow members any time through the online childcare and early childhood education practice, policy, and research discussion forum.
- Early Childhood Service plans can view ALL member articles: Individual, Research Journals and Early Childhood Service articles. Also on this membership plan members can access the online discussion forum for individual members AND the online ECE service management / business forum.
- Research Journal subscription plans can view our library of Research Journals and related research articles only
Should you not hold a current membership – you are welcome to apply now.